It's been almost 2 years since I wrote an article about how IBM planned to take advantage of TM1 OLAP Server which it acquired as part of the Cognos acquisition.  The article "TM1 Olap Gets its Day in the Sun " outlined how TM1 would be a strategic cog in the IBM Cognos BI and Performance Management strategy.  So I decided to take a look back at that article which I wrote when I was at AMR Research (now part of Gartner) and see just how well IBM Cognos had executed on that strategy.


Below are some excepts from the article outlining the roadmap IBM Cognos laid out for analysts at the time:

 

1.  TM1 will become the underlying engine for Cognos Planning over time.

 

 

2. TM1 will provide analytics and reporting against transaction-level data from general ledger, accounts payable, and accounts receivable systems. The intent is to expand this to include other transaction level analysis of sales, inventory, and procurement over time.

 

3.  Cognos will combine the TM1 engine, some prepackaged Cognos 8 Reports, and Applix’s Executive Viewer (acquired in 2006), with its target set on midmarket companies looking for a combined reporting, analysis, and planning product. The first release will provide Excel-based planning and analytics via Executive Viewer, with following releases adding reporting and additional planning capabilities.

4.  TM1 will be a native data source for Cognos 8 BI instead of integrated so that it can take advantage of services such as query, scheduling, presentation, and others without any data latency that often occurs when integrating a non-native data source.

 

---

 

Now, two years later, let's grade how they executed on the roadmap for TM1

1. Planning Engine - Grade=B+  TM1 is now the underlying technology for planning for new customers.  Enhancements such as personal hierarchies and scenarios address some of TM1's the previous shortcomings as a planning engine.  Planning down to the SKU level, which was challenging in Cognos Planning works much better in TM1.  Managed contribution on TM1 includes much of the workflow functionality that Cognos Enterprise Planning clients have come to know and love.  The migration path for legacy Cognos Planning clients is not seamless but IBM Cognos is not forcing a migration for those clients not yet ready to migrate.  There will be a cost to migrate to TM1 server but clients will receive full credit for existing contributor licenses.

2. Transaction Analytics - Grade=B   TM1 has long had a strength in financial analysis because of its in-memory architecture.  Improvements in administration and resource allocation have improved performance and concurrency allowing TM1 to be an analytic engine for transation-level data stored in EDWs and load data from transaction systems into TM1 in near real-time.  However, query performance may not be as strong as other read-only, preaggregated solutions.

3. Mid-Market Planning & Analysis - Grade=A  IBM Cognos Express is doing very well in the mid-market as a combined planning, analysis and reporting product.  They have done a very good job of packaging up functionality from many assets into an "IT-lite" but comprehensive mid-market offering and are making a big splash with it in the market place. 

4. Native to Cognos 8 BI - Grade=B+   Planning, Budgeting and Forecasting or other PM applications, developed in TM1, can be accessed from within the BI portal and the BI components can access the TM1 data in real-time.  Framework Manager integration enables consumption of TM1 cube data via IBM Cognos 8 BI. 

There are still enhancements to be made to TM1 planning  in order to lure legacy Cognos Enterprise Planning clients over to TM1 but a lot of progress has been made.  Cognos Controller will remain on its existing relational technology with TM1 "ebedded" for analysis which makes sense but does not unify their PM products on the TM1 engine.

Overall, I give IBM an A-/B+ in meeting their roadmap for TM1 since the acquisition of Cognos.  Former Applix clients that came over to IBM with the acquistion (who are borderline "cult-ish" about TM1) should be happy with the attention their product has gotten from Big Blue.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

With the combination of PowerPivot and Reporting Services Microsoft makes some great advancements towards Pervasive BI and I certainly advise clients using older versions of Reporting Services to take a look. I think you will like what you see. << MORE >>

Oracle EPM Oracle (and SAP and IBM for that matter) have spent a lot of time and resources integrating their acquisitions over the last several years but we are now seeing some significant functional releases come to fruition. << MORE >>

Yesterday I attended the launch of the results of the IBM Global CFO Study attended by a small group of research analysts, IBM clients, IBM GBS leaders and IBMers. The survey included input from a diverse group of over 1900 CFOs and Finance leaders. Approximately, 1500 of the participants were directly interviewed in addition to completing the survey.<< MORE >>

Forrester Research recently banned their analysts from blogging. This is precipitated by the recent defection of several "Rock Star Analysts" who took the brand they created for themselves via their blogs and started up their own boutique analyst firms. Gartner, IDC and other firms are also grappling with this issue.<< MORE >>

The 2010 Gartner Magic Quadrant for CPM Suites is out and pretty much every vendor listed has issued a press release about their placement on the Quadrant.  This is a testament to the level of influence placement on the Magic Quadrant has in the market. But how much weight should the Quadrant be given?

"...and the winner is..."
I've had more than a few clients tell me that they have made a vendor selection only ... << MORE >>

As part of my webinar series sponsored by IBM Cognos two strategies for Business Intelligence deployment are discussed. The Big Bang approach and the Silo approach.<< MORE >>

The mega-vendors in EPM (IBM, Oracle, and SAP) will have banner years in selling EPM (Enterprise Performance Management)into their existing client bases and adding EPM into the scope of large technology purchases and strategic initiatives. Strong growth in the mid-market will also be a highlight in 2010.<< MORE >>

Business Intelligence (BI) continues to be the most strategic initiative for the CIO according to research by Gartner, IBM and others. However, even strategic initiatives struggle to get funding when budgets are tight. BI competes for limited funding against many other strategic and tactical initiatives that often have compelling ROI cases. << MORE >>

Jonathan, John Schwarz, Jim Hagerman Snabe, and Vishal Sikka spent the rest of the morning discussing how "this is not your grandmother's SAP" and how SAP is planning to embrace the cloud and continue to exploit analytics to drive growth. They acknowledged that the days of counting on 7-figure deals to drive growth are over and how SAP will deliver higher volume, lower cost solutions to the market place. << MORE >>